Friday, January 31, 2003

there are us and uk troops in iraq, pravda says and the pentagon admits they're there performing 'reconnaissance missions'.



'Pravda.Ru contacts within the SAS confirm that reconnaissance activities can easily be termed as sabotage, murder or vandalism'. so, doesn't the fact that war has not been declared make these people terrorists under fuhrer bush's definition of the word? and doesn't it mean that he now has to declare war on the uk and on the us because they're encouraging and financing terrorism?



i hope some of these terrorists get caught and are treated as badly by the iraqis as the afghan 'terrorists' have been treated by the americans at camp x-ray. but if that happens, won't herr general bush be whining and whinging about their status as prisoners of war and other such crap - a status which he's steadfastly denied the afghans?



george walker bush is a sponsor of terrorism, a liar, a serial-murderer, an election stealer and is completely immoral. please, somebody, save the world from disaster and remove the little runt from office as soon as possible.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home