Tuesday, January 21, 2003

blair's refusing to rule out using nuclear weapons in iraq



what the fuck drug is this man on? it's obviously better than anything i've ever tried and i want a few grams to keep me from thinking about the consequences of his possible actions.



why won't someone stop this insane bastard before he goes too far? why won't cherie refuse to fuck him until he stops his war-mongering? why won't his kids withdraw their affection until he stops threatening the lives of millions of innocent iraqis? why won't the labour party kick him out of office and put someone with just a grain of humanity in his place?



tony, dear, get this message from the overwhelming majority of british voters - we don't want war, you bastard, and we don't want nuclear weapons used against anyone - except you, you racist, intolerant, bigotted creep. you make everyone's skin crawl. why don't you get back under your stone and stay there, you little shit?



since blair keeps bleating about saddam having weapons of mass destruction, why the fuck do we have them? if they're naughty in iraq, they're naughty here. why won't blair / bush / straw / rumsfeld and the rest of these war-mongering animals get rid of these weapons here? why won't they engage in real conversation about the issue? why won't they ratify disarmament and non-proliferation treaties? oops, forgot; they're politicians and, therefore, liars, cheats, thieves and murderers.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home