clarke faces backlash over terrorism laws and better than belmarsh - just.



the flappy-eared bastard needs more than a backlash; he needs a good dose of his own medicine - imprisonment without charge and without knowing when he'll be released, then house arrest, prevention from earning a living, prevention from contacting the outside world, oh, and a nice bit of police brutality thrown in - to remind him just how cruel his proposed actions are.



the man's a fucking brute who needs to be taught a lesson in how not to treat others.



his proposals are wicked, no, evil in the extreme and we need back-bench m.p.s to reject them roundly and completely.



as sir brian barder says, the courts should decide whether someone should be imprisoned, not the government and, as anthony berrow says, especially not an evil little scrote like charles clarke.