u.s. denies need for falluja aid convoy .



the real reason the u.s. military don't want the red crescent in falluja is that they don't want their massacre of the civilians in the city to come to light.



having so far killed 100,000 iraqi civilians, reported in the lancet, the most respected medical journal in the world, and having convinced the corporates' mouth-pieces in the media to pretend that the figures are inaccurate, the fascist bastards in the pentagon and in whitehall now have their lackeys denying any civilian casulaties in falluja.



fortunately, there are still journalists who will tell it more like it really is : a city lies in ruins, along with the lives of the wretched survivors, although even here we're told there were "few civilians left" in the city before the destruction started. why lie? there were about 30,000 civilians still there. they're probably almost all dead - so, i suppose, bliar and cunt were right - there's no need for aid 'cos there's no-one left alive to receive it.

---

stan goff (torure and cinema) has a good explanation of how why many people will accept this behaviour and the lies that go with it.